CANON CITY, Colo. — The inmate who fatally beat serial killer and sex offender Jeffrey Dahmer in prison in the early-1990s has revealed his reasons for doing so in a new interview.
Christopher Scarver, who was incarcerated at the same Portage, Wisc., prison as Dahmer back in 1994, recently divulged the details of his killing to the New York Post.
“Some people who are in prison are repentant — but he was not one of them,” he told the Post, recounting details of Dahmer’s brutal and unapologetic taunts to other inmates.
Scarver said in the interview Dahmer used to fashion limbs out of the prison food, applying ketchup on places to represent blood.
Though they were taunts, the actions represented a more chilling reality. Dahmer was arrested in 1991 after police found human remains and decomposing bodies in his apartment. Dahmer later confessed to 17 murders, many of which included the rape and dismemberment of the victims.
In 1992 Dahmer was sentenced to 15 life terms in prison after a court rejected his insanity defense.
Despite Dahmer’s abominable past, Scarver told the Post the killer initially left “no impression” on him.
“I never interacted with him,” he told the Post. He would watch from afar, avoiding contact due to Dahmer’s friction with other inmates.
That was until Nov. 28, 1994.
Dahmer, 34 at the time, and another inmate were tasked to clean the bathrooms — unshackled and unattended.
Scarver, then 25 and himself a convicted murderer, was with them. He told the Post he’d kept a newspaper clipping that detailed Dahmer’s killings.
He found his fellow inmate to have a lust for flesh, and was “disgusted” with the details of his actions.
Scarver told the Post he’d gone to retrieve a mop when he felt someone poke his back. When he turned around, he saw Dahmer and the other inmate “laughing under their breath.”
“I looked right into their eyes, and I couldn’t tell which had done it,” he told the Post.
But after the three men split up, Scarver decided to follow Dahmer to the locker room.
He told the Post he confronted Dahmer with the news article, asking the killer if he’d really done the things described in the story.
When Dahmer tried to escape, Scarver then took a metal bar and swung it at his head, crushing Dahmer’s skull.
Scarver then found the other inmate, Jesse Anderson, and did “[p]retty much the same thing.”
Scarver told the New York Post he believes the prison officials left them all alone on purpose, knowing he hated Dahmer and wanted him dead.
“They had something to do with what took place. Yes,” he told the Post.
After the murders, he pleaded insanity, but later changed it to “no contest” in exchange for a transfer to a federal penitentiary.
According to the New York Post, Scarver was then sentenced to two life terms on top of the one he was already serving at the time.
Scarver had been sentenced in 1990 for the murder of his former boss during a robbery, the Post notes.
He is currently incarcerated at Centennial Correctional Facility in Canon City, Colo.
Scarver now spends some of his time writing poetry for his website. Related: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/why-killed-jeffrey-dahmer-prisoner-5600323?ICID=FB_mirror_main
terstate 75.
Forensic Files 
William Case
Texas 20 hours ago
Critics faulted the Corsicana Fire Department arson investigator in the Willingham case for not following National Fire Protection Association arson investigation guidelines. However, in court hearings following Willingham’s 2004 execution, the critics admitted that the guidelines has not been published in 1991, when the arson investigation was conducted. The guidelines were first published in 1992. The critics primarily faulted the arson investigator for listing separate points of origin as one of about a dozen indications of arson. Willingham had set one fire in the hallway leading to his daughters’ bedroom and a second fire at the front door. (Prior to setting the fire, he had pushed a refrigerator to block the back door which led from the kitchen i to the back yard.) The critics pointed out that an extremely hot fire can mimic separate points of origin by causing flames to “flash” to other parts of buildings. However, firemen said that the Willingham fire wasn’t a “hot fire” and witnesses say they saw smoke but no flames. It took firemen only a few minute to extinguish the flames. After the Willingham case became controversial, the fire department hired independent arson investigators to go back over the forensic evidence using the latest guidelines. They concluded it was arson. Willingham’s defense also hire its own arson investigator, but did call him to testify at the trial because he also determined the fire was deliberately set.
Surferdude
DC
Yeah, that’s why this case is the poster child against capital punishment. Try reading the report cited in the article. It won’t take long – no need to go beyond the first sentence that states that it wasn’t arson.
Tasha
Bay Area
I am not sure where you have collected these “facts”, but I would recommend a New Yorker article (http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/09/07/trial-by-fire): In a “scathing” report, the fire scientist hired by the commission established by the Texas government to investigate the case “concluded that investigators in the case had no scientific basis for claiming that the fire was arson, ignored evidence that contradicted their theory, had no comprehension of flashover and fire dynamics, relied on discredited folklore, and failed to eliminate potential accidental or alternative causes of the fire. He said that… the approach [of the deputy fire marshal investigating the case at the time] seemed to deny ‘rational reasoning’ and was more ‘characteristic of mystics or psychics.’ What’s more, [he] determined that the investigation violated… ‘not only the standards of today but even of the time period.'” It appears that Willingham was executed for a ‘crime’ that never happened. In addition, last week the “the State Bar of Texas filed a formal accusation of misconduct… [including] obstruction of justice, making false statements and concealing evidence favorable to Willingham’s defense” against the county prosecutor who convicted Willingham (http://www.texastribune.org/2015/03/18/prosecutor-accused-misconduct-tx-….